Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
| librematch:design:matchmaking:rating [2022-10-27 22:56] – removed - external edit (Unknown date) 127.0.0.1 | librematch:design:matchmaking:rating [2022-10-29 03:28] (current) – simonsan | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | ====== Rating ====== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Glicko2 | ||
| + | * Discussion: different Ratings and influence on Matchmaking? | ||
| + | * 1vs1 Rating (RM/DM/EW), TG-Rating (RM/DM/EW), Arabia Rating? | ||
| + | * or rather just a 1v1 and TG-Rating? | ||
| + | * another possibility: | ||
| + | * open/ | ||
| + | * three categories weighted | ||
| + | * hybrid: megarandom, water, other ame modes | ||
| + | * open could be arabia | ||
| + | * closed something like black forest, arena, michi | ||
| + | * if someone doesn' | ||
| + | * pair Rating systems: | ||
| + | * someone who is super strong on Arabia should be also usable on Black Forest | ||
| + | * Similarly, islands, whoever can do Archer Micro won't go down completely. | ||
| + | * If you consider them completely separately, you also run the risk that a player has too few games on individual ladders for decisive ratings. | ||
| + | * it's like `core rating + open rating` and both have to adjust a bit after one game. | ||
| + | * or `core rating + open rating + 1v1 Rating` e.g. and then you can even weight them | ||
| + | * something like core rating counts 50% of the overall rating, open rating 20%, 1v1 rating 30% | ||
| + | * `core rating` can be also including the starting rating from another ladder/from another rating system with a factor to include it into the core rating for migrating from other platforms (something like this is existing already on ncZone) | ||
| + | |||
| + | AoE2DE currently does it like [[ https:// | ||